Tucson Unified School District

For Parents | For Students | For Alumni | For Educators | For the Community

Bridging Three Centuries
"...The best of times, the worst of times..."
1980-1993 Part 1

 

"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times." Dickens' words could apply to the Tucson Unified School District in this era. On the one hand, awards and honors flowed into the district. On the other, parents sued claiming inferior education. The state legislature passed special funding for certain programs, yet failed to meet inflationary costs or even the statutory funding formula which affected all regular schooling. The largest bond in history received voter approval, but override extensions repeatedly failed and massive budget cuts were necessary.

The Merrill Grant years were tumultuous. Dr. Grant stepped into a district recovering from a strike, in the midst of desegregation, and in the seventh year of declining enrollment. There was a plan for reorganization of administration and curriculum which had not yet been implemented. Budgetary constraints and miscalculations dogged his superintendency. Grant began directing action in many areas.

Fiscal and physical plant woes increase
Sagging ceilings at Mission View and Borton caused Dr. Grant to close both schools a few weeks before school was out in 1980. Board members were irritated that Grant made the decision without informing them. Minority community criticism was sharp, blaming the board and administration for not caring about south and westside schools.

Ceilings and roofs continued to be an expensive problem in a number of eastside schools built in the 1960s. Just before school started in the fall of 1987, the ceiling literally fell in on Roskruge as it was about to open as Roskruge Bilingual Middle Magnet School. After the incident, the students were bused to temporary locations and the school was closed for repairs. More than $2 million was needed for the repairs to the 80-year old building.

Over the next thirteen years arsonists created havoc with fires at Tully, Menlo Park, Ford, Erickson, Duffy, and Steele Elementary Schools, Utterback Middle School, and Rincon and Sabino High Schools. Liability and casualty insurance premiums for the district in the early 1980s went from $620,000 to $1.45 million in one year, and then increased another $200,000 before the first premium was paid on the new policy.

In December, 1980, the school district faced a potential $910,000 deficit in the operating budget. Cuts were ordered in many areas, including freezing vacant non-certified positions and using resource teachers to fill teaching vacancies. Administrators and other certified non-classroom people were asked to be temporary substitute teachers. At the same time, the district was reorganized into 4 regions, each under the direction of an assistant superintendent, as recommended in the Peat, Marwick, Mitchell study of several years before. Throughout the decade forced cuts in resource and curriculum areas were made, cutting the classroom support systems that had been built during the growth years of Morrow and Lee. Increased class sizes were ordered for adaptive education and resource teachers.

Discipline problems increase
Most high schools experienced occasional short-term student walkouts over campus incidents or administrative actions related to budgetary problems. Sporadic acts of violence at district high schools continued throughout the next decade. The school district spent nearly $300,000 for security personnel, mostly campus monitors, adding to the funds spent previously for fire and burglar alarms, metal screens and non-shatter windows in an attempt to cut vandalism costs.

The Star detailed the changes in student behavior in a May, 1980, article: "...This school year, as of April 30, 207 high school students had been suspended from one to 45 days for possession or use of alcohol, tobacco or drugs. No one had been expelled. The leading reason for student suspensions, is defiance of authority. Disruptive behavior or interference with school policies is the second leading reason. Since the district began keeping statistics in 1975-76, suspensions have risen from 344 to 1, 780 in 1978-79. Of the total 1,325 were high school students.... "

In a surprise action without public input, the school board decided in May, 1981, to eliminate corporal punishment as a form of disciplinary action. Board member Grijalva worried that corporal punishment was used more often on minority students than others, while member Eva Bacal felt that corporal punishment was a form of brutality.

Student "high jinks" at high school graduations concerned administration at the start of the 1980s. Graduates were increasingly rowdy during formerly solemn graduation ceremonies. At the end of the '70s, central administrators were speaking somberly of canceling ceremonies because of student use of beach balls, firecrackers, and, less acceptable, liquor and marijuana, during the ceremonies, as well as noisy cheers by family members.

New goals identifed
In 1981 Merrill Grant called for attention to critical district needs: raising test scores, support for the new magnet schools, bilingual education, the middle school program, a better budget process, energy conservation, standardizing across the district a K-12 curriculum that set standards and student responsibilities. Dr. Grant promised cuts in administration, some of which would be accomplished through retirements and attrition. Others would be made through reorganization which would eliminate positions. However, as time passed, budgetary problems became the overriding issue facing the district.

The annual RIF of teachers grew to larger and larger numbers. In April, 1981, 454 teachers received RIF notices. The number equaled all of the non-tenured teachers in the district. By fall, all of them had been re-hired. A $10 activity fee for all high school sports and extracurricular activities was charged to help meet budget shortfalls, along with a reduction in high school graduation requirements and elimination of high school classes with low enrollments. The average class size for high schools went from 22-25 to 27-29 students. High school department chairmen were reduced to five per school, and a loss of $ 1.1 million in federal Title I funds eliminated 130 classroom teacher aides. Reading resource teachers and other specialists such as speech therapists, social workers, psychologists, adaptive education counselors, and health clerks were reduced in number.

Dr. Florence Reynolds, the acting superintendent prior to Dr. Merrill Grant, held one of the senior administrative positions cut in 1981. She was reassigned to a lesser position at a significant cut in pay. The action shocked many people in the community. In the spring of 1982, Dr. Reynolds retired after 39 years in TUSD. Over the next few years, top administrators who had been hired and promoted by Morrow and Lee retired. Other central administrators were demoted, again to the dismay of many people. Site administrators were transferred to new positions, moving those who had been in one place for more than 5 to 7 years. Many of the administrators who had been hired and promoted in the post-World War II boom were now reaching retirement age, and the district was open to new administrative leadership in many areas. Over this decade an early retirement program was opened by the legislature which made it desirable to leave in a time of turmoil.

The fall of 1981 showed a continuing drop in enrollment, to 54,092 students in 99 schools. At the corresponding time, the percentage of minority students in the district continued to increase to 39.4 percent of students. A 3-year study of dropout rates acknowledged some improvement in a slow but consistent trend.

Facilities decisions and new magnets
A remodeling project for 10 schools more than 40 years old began in 1982. Wakefield, Mansfeld, Doolen, and Safford Junior High Schools, as well as Miles, Menlo Park, Hughes, Wrightstown, Ochoa and Safford Elementary Schools would be brought into more modern condition. A citizen committee and the school board considered closure of 32 under-enrolled schools. The final disposition affected five schools: Gump, Brown, Bonillas, Booth and Fickett.

Gump Adaptive Education School and Brown Elementary School were closed. The Gump students and school name were relocated to the Brown campus at a cost of $858,669. The name, Brown Elementary School, was retired from the district rolls. The relocated Gump School was then closed permanently in 1992 and its students were reassigned to the three other adaptive education schools. The Gump School name was then also retired from the district rolls.

In 1981, a group calling itself the Citizens for Basic Education had asked the school district to open a "back to basics" school as its next alternative program. They wanted a program which emphasized the 3R's, patriotism, discipline, and a dress code. The group also asked for intensive phonics for reading instruction, math learned through rote memorization, social studies taught as facts, and strict grading and testing. The back-to-basics magnet school was placed at the under-enrolled Bonillas campus, where it was called Bonillas Basic Curriculum School.

In 1986, the Basic Curriculum Middle School was formed to continue the Bonillas program into middle school years. The BCMS was housed at Vail Middle School until 1992. At that date, BCMS was moved to the then vacant Gump campus, and the school was renamed Dodge Middle School. Ida Flood Dodge had been a teacher in the Tucson Public Schools for 33 years in the early days of the school district. She was a student at Safford School at the turn of the century. Mrs. Dodge, as a girl, had been part of the family which lived in the Old Adobe High School building for a time. She was also an author and historian. The 1989 bond project provided the funds to renovate the old Gump campus into a middle school design.

Parents in the Booth Elementary and Fickett Junior High area successfully persuaded the school board to open in 1984 a K-8 math and science magnet school using the joint campus rather than closing the schools. Neither Bonillas nor Booth-Fickett were included under the desegregation court order, but both were open to students from all over the district. The vacant University Heights Elementary School was sold to an apartment developer for $800,000, and Roosevelt Elementary was sold to Pima Community College to become part of its Downtown Campus.

The board decided to rename Special Projects High School in time for the 1982-83 school year. The name chosen was University High School, to reflect the advanced placement courses commonly available at the school. Conflict over the placement of University High School on the campus of Tucson High arose in early 1983. Parents complained that less than 12 percent of the University High enrollment was from minority students. Tucson High parents felt discrimination in the quality of classes and equipment available to their children, in contrast to those for the University High students on the same campus. Throughout the next twelve months controversy swirled over whether the school should be moved to the campus of Roskruge or Rincon, with parent groups arguing for both sites. In October, 1984, the board voted to move the program to the Rincon High School campus, where it remains.

Educational activities and community support
The district began its annual Love of Reading Week celebration in February 1982. The districtwide program featured community leaders, authors, employees, and parents all sharing with students their enjoyment of reading. Civic officials, businessmen, and district administrators took time to read a story and talk about reading in their lives in classes all over the district. The celebration takes place concurrently with Valentine's Day each year for a full school week.

Vocational programs listed in a school board report from 1981-82 included Auto Mechanics, Computing and Accounting, Cosmetology, Consumer & Homemaking Education, Child Care and Guidance, Distributive Education, Office Occupations, Trades & Industrial Education.

Computer use in the schools appeared in a 1983 newspaper article stating the district had 474 computers for 53,283 students, with 345 of those computers at the high schools.59 Individual elementary schools might have single computers purchased through PTA funds. Later in the decade several of the high schools installed computer labs for remediation programs. Twelve elementary and middle schools also acquired small computer labs as part of various pilots of integrated learning systems. The district began a phasing in process of buying hardware and software so each school would have some access to computer technology.

Community participation and financial support for the school district were organized in the formation of the Educational Enrichment Foundation (EEF). The EEF raised funds which were granted to teachers and schools to carry out innovative teaching ideas. As time went on, the EEF provided a support system for students having difficulty paying fees for extracurricular activities, and helped raise funds for the Clothing Bank as well.

Other types of assistance for the school district came from the community. Ronald D. Kohn, a 45-year old real estate investor wrote a $25,000 check to the district to be used for remedial reading programs. The IBM Corporation provided fundamental management training for 120 administrators in a week-long seminar in 1984-85.

Secondary school issues
High school vocational programs at the start of the '80s included: Auto Mechanics, Computing and Accounting, Cosmetology, Consumer and Homemaking Education, Child Care and Guidance, Distributive Education, Office Occupations, and Trades and Industrial Education.

The district continued to work on the dropout problem throughout the decade. Alternative endeavors such as middle school accommodation and high school accommodations, the bridge program, and Project RISE joined the list of more conventional alternatives such as Project M.O.R.E. and the inhouse suspension programs. A variety of sources provided funds for specialized efforts, including a Yaqui tutoring program.

In 1984 the state legislature passed two bills providing for two important changes for high school students in Arizona. Representative Carmen Cajero of Tucson succeeded in passing legislation authorizing free high school textbooks starting with the freshmen in the fall of 1985, and phasing in for all grades by 1989. The second law required at least a 10th grade education for all students. Previously only an 8th grade education, or age 16, whichever came first, was required. Rep. Cajero and her late husband, Rep. Bernardo "Nayo" Cajero, sought this law since 1966. The textbook bill was signed into law at Tucson High School, and the 10th grade education requirement was signed into law at Carrillo Intermediate Magnet School.

The TUSD High School Task Force issued a critical report in 1984 saying the high schools lacked quality programs, good management, and efficient organization. After studying the district for four months, the Task Force called for strengthening the instructional leadership and providing more time for instruction and counseling. They asked for a better and more complete informational system that would provide student data in a timely fashion. In addition, they wanted standards defined for graduating seniors. Pueblo, Cholla, and Tucson High Schools were identified as having more problems than the other district high schools.

Dr. Grant described Pueblo High School as being top priority for improvement in January, 1984. A month later Tucson High was designated a "new school" which required all staff to reapply for their positions. The tactic, first used after the desegregation settlement, was used at various schools throughout the decade when site administration problems appeared to be critical. Pueblo High, Fort Lowell Elementary, and Vail Middle School were some of the schools to be so designated, as well as the new magnet schools.

Native-American groups asked for funding for an Indian Education Plan to increase academic achievement. They pointed out the Yaqui dropout rate was 26 percent at Cholla High School alone.

Coalition for Educational Excellence
Dr. Grant's period of accord with the school board came to an end. In 1983, his contract was renewed by a 3-2 vote, with board members questioning administrative changes and board superintendent relations. Financial problems continued. A series of building maintenance problems ranging from leaking roofs to allergy-causing moldy insulation brought board complaints about spending capital funds for salaries and educational programs. The following year, although the district received its first "clean" financial audit in 10 years, the board still turned down three of Grant' s ideas for reorganization as not matching what the board felt was needed.

On the heels of these problems in March, 1984, came the formation of a community group which called itself the Coalition for Excellence in Education. The organization was composed of district employees, business and professional people from the Tucson community, and interested parents. Warren Rustand, a local business leader who chaired the desegregation Facilities Committee and was active in designing the magnet school program, was chosen as leader of the Coalition. he local newspapers chronicled the activities of the Coalition over the next year.

Public meetings of the organization in local hotels were attended by as many as 600 people. The group said it wanted to take its concerns to Dr. Grant to work out problems in the district. They described problems as ranging from poor morale and quality of education to administrative appointments and budgetary procedures. The district was quickly polarized, with charges flying in all directions. Leaders of the Coalition were the targets of death threats and vandalism. Their motives were criticized as racist and political power plays. Meanwhile the district administration was accused by the Coalition of illegal acts and political payoffs in administrative appointments. However, the school board did bring in an outside agency to investigate certain allegations concerning the personnel department.

In July, 1984, a new Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. report focused on management in TUSD. Along with noting that many of the recommendations from the 1977 study had been initiated, the report warned, "...the board needs to carefully determine a point beneath which management reductions will have a negative impact on educational as well as administrative functions.60

The director of personnel resigned in August, 1984, amid charges that he had falsely claimed a university degree on his employment application. In September, 1984, attorneys for the Coalition and the school district met to discuss Coalition demands which included firing Merrill Grant.61 February 7, 1985, Dr. Merrill Grant resigned, saying the action was "my move, my decision completely." He was critical of the pressure on district workers from the Coalition, saying they were forced to respond to rumors, innuendo and hundreds of requests for information on a daily basis.

A Star editorial in February, 1985, described the situation: "...The Coalition for Educational Excellence....called for Grant's immediate resignation in December. It described his five years as a failure of management procedures, processes and style which inspire confidence, trust and loyalty....In a three year period, Grant, shook up the administrative staff considerably and therein lies the source of much criticism against him. Out of 192 administrative staff members, 90 percent are either new to the district or have been transferred or promoted. That disappointed and disenchanted a lot of people.."

The Magett interval
Dr. Dorothy Magett was named Interim Acting Superintendent a week later, as a national search for the next superintendent was launched. Dr. Magett was first hired by Merrill Grant into central administration in 1982, and then promoted to deputy superintendent in 1983. Now she was the fourth woman in TUSD history, and the only African-American, to serve temporarily as the chief administrator. Dorothy Magett had received her Ed.D. from Northwestem University, and had been hired from Seattle Public Schools. Soon several board members were speaking of her as a possible permanent successor to Grant.

Shortly after Dr. Magett took over, the Board voted to go to the public for support of a bond issue and override election in May, 1985. A Tucson Citizen editorial warned, "Tucson's public schools may be headed for big money trouble if the Legislature doesn't come through with a healthy appropriation....Years of insufficient support from Phoenix has caused a shortfall that even austerity can't take care of anymore."

A successful override election
The voting public responded to the cries of alarm. TUSD successfully passed a $47.5 million construction bond in 1985, the first in 10 years, which would go to build three new elementary schools and a new middle school, as well as provide extensive repairs to many of the older buildings. In addition the voters approved a $16.1 million budget override. As a result of the override and new special funding from the legislature, the district was able to purchase 27 new school buses to replace obsolete ones. In addition, the legislature provided special funding for a kindergarten through third grade educational support program to the schools in the state, to be used to give children a better start in schooling. TUSD received an extra $1.158 million from the K-3 legislation.

Health issues
A serious measles outbreak in Pima County in April, 1985, struck Tucson Unified as well. Under orders from Pima County health officials, all students and employees were required to show proof of measles immunization or be excluded from school. Four-hundred-forty-seven students were turned away. In spite of this preventive action, Santa Rita High School reported 19 cases of measles. A few months later, 1,400 students at Pueblo High required gamma globulin shots after a cafeteria student worker came down with infectious hepatitis.

Later in the same year the school district began developing a policy for dealing with Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) in the schools, after a local physician informed the district an infected child would be registering. The district policy was intended to protect the privacy and health of the student or employee with the disease, as well as that of the community. In 1987, two years later, TUSD became the first district in the state to adopt a formal plan for teaching middle school and high school students about the disease.

Asbestos removal was an expensive health issue in the latter part of the decade. Although EPA funds assisted in the cleanup, still almost a half-million dollars was needed from district funds to accomplish the project.

Cholla High School students were tested for tuberculosis in March 1990, after 34 students showed positive tests for tuberculosis. A student came from Mexico with an advanced case of the disease, resulting in tests initially for his classmates, and finally for the whole school. Ultimately, 35 students and one teacher required medication to prevent a full-blown case of the disease.

The board banned tobacco products and smoking anywhere in district buildings effective January 1991. A six-month phase-out period allowed adults to smoke in privately owned vehicles or outside of view of students in outdoor areas, but that would expire in July. The ban also covered district employees doing their job away from district property, such as crossing guards and field trip supervision, and volunteers in schools were also included.

Required immunization of students was enforced by a state law taking effect in 1992. Parents must provide written proof of immunization prior to enrollment. Students lacking such proof must be suspended until shots were taken.

Throughout the 80s teachers, parents, and children complained of health problems related to leaking roofs, moldy carpets and insulation, allergens, and heating or cooling problems in the schools. Buildings on both the east and west perimeter of the district experienced problems dating from poor construction methods.


Notes

59Mary M. Niez, "Computers aid for pupils who aren't average" Tucson Citizen November 24, 1983.

60Mary Bustamante, "Consultants say TUSD is duplicating chores" Tucson Citizen July 4, 1984.

61 Chip Warren, "3 on TUSD board charge group is trying 'blackmail' to get its way" Arizona Daily Star October 2, 1984.


The Previous Chapter: "The Desegregation Questions" 1968-1983
Next Chapter: "...The best of times, the worst of times..." 1980-1993 Part 2
Return to Bridging Three Centuries Table of Contents

Home | District Information | Governing Board | Student Guidelines |
Departments | Schools | Employment | News and Events | Contents
Tucson Unified School DistrictFor more information contact:
Tucson Unified School District, 1010 E. 10th Street, Tucson AZ 85719
Telephone: 520-225-6000
E-Mail: webmaster@tusd.k12.az.us

Notice of Nondiscrimination/Aviso De No Discriminacion